7 results for 'cat:"Health Care" AND cat:"Negligence" AND cat:"Medical Malpractice"'.
J. Shulman finds that the lower court properly found that a couple cannot sue a fertility clinic for medical malpractice for the failure to properly store their embryos. However, the couple's negligence claims are reinstated, as experts presented conflicting testimony regarding the potential impact of the cryopreservation process on the embryos. It is up for a jury to determine whether the embryos were already in poor condition when preserved, or if the clinic allowed them to degrade. Reversed in part.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Shulman, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 02088, Categories: health Care, negligence, medical Malpractice
J. Leggatt finds a lower court improperly dismissed a group of separate families' motion for claims of emotional distress. A group of hospital administrators argued that they were not obligated to protect family members from witnessing the deaths of their decedents. However, the families sufficiently showed in court that the administration failed to provide them with mental health services as a result of the deaths, which falls under medical negligence. Reversed.
Court: Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Judge: Leggatt, Filed On: January 11, 2024, Case #: 2024UKSC1, Categories: health Care, negligence, medical Malpractice
J. Whitney denies a health care system’s motion to dismiss medical malpractice claims brought by a patient and his wife after a nurse administered a medication that caused the patient to suffer a second stroke. The patient and his wife’s amended complaint does satisfy federal rules, so the system is denied its motion. Also, the system is only partially entitled to summary judgment. While it correctly asserts that it was in no way responsible for the treatment given the patient, questions as to the patient’s negligent hiring and supervision claim and his wife’s loss of consortium claim still stand due to remaining disputes of material facts.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Whitney, Filed On: December 20, 2023, Case #: 3:22cv317, NOS: Personal Injury - Medical Malpractice - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: health Care, negligence, medical Malpractice
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Davies finds a lower court improperly dismissed a mother's medical malpractice claims against a hospital. The hospital argued that it was not responsible for injuries to her infant's brain during delivery. However, the mother presented sufficient evidence in court that the hospital failed to prevent the infant from suffering acute profound hypoxic ischemia prior to and during childbirth, which resulted in permanent brain damage and a diagnoses of quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Reversed.
Court: Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, Judge: Davies, Filed On: November 15, 2023, Case #: CA-2022-2143, Categories: health Care, negligence, medical Malpractice